Overall, I have found this course to be very informative. There were times of confusion about assignments, when things were due, where to post responses, etc.; however, overall the course was organized and developed in a professional manner.
Before this course began, I didn't know what it was going to entail. I was already technologically literate, what more is there to learn, so I thought. Well, there is so much more to learn about technology and its components and how to effectively integrate such tools into the everyday teaching of the students that it is hard to imagine.
I find technology to be very interesting, yet intimidating at times. There is so much to learn, so many different tools and ways of doing things, I am "scared" to a point. By taking this course, I had envisioned having such "intimidation" taken away or at least minimized, and it was. I wanted to learn all there is to learn to help myself, my current students and my future role as an instructional leader of technology, and I did.
I learned that technology is a serious matter and the importance of understanding all aspects it entails; the tools, the safeties and ethics, the integration across all areas and levels of learning, etc. is necessary and needs to be understood by all. I learned about the Long Range Plan for Technology 2006-2020, in which I knew nothing about beforehand. I now know we as educators had standards and guidelines that are expected to be followed in integrating technology into the everyday teaching of the students in turning our students into technology "natives" rather than technology "immigrants." I became much more familiar and knowledgeable about the STaR Chart survey and its importance and components. Before, the STaR Chart was something I was told to complete without proper explanation of its significance. Now I know the components of the chart, where my campus and district rank technologically compared to others and what needs to be done to increase our level of integration of technology for our students.
I believe I am now more knowledgeable in areas that are most important to my future role as an instructional leader, areas of laws, cyber ethics, Technology Applications TEKS, standards and the importance of modeling and preparing future teachers with the tools they need to successfully teach students in becoming technology savvy. Before, I didn't know the importance of technology and its integration to learning as much as I do now. Technology is a tool that is needed for our students to become technologically literate as they should. In order for students to be taught effectively, teachers need to be properly educated in the usage and importance of such tools. Proper teaching comes from effective professional development. As a future leader, I ensure my teachers will effectively be educated and qualified in the technology field. Peer mentoring will be a strategy that will be used for teachers to help assist and educate one another in such areas. Technology usage, tools and decision-making will include all stakeholders. We will work together as a team to stay up-to-date on technology advancements, remain prepared on how to successfully integrate technology safely in the everyday teaching of the students through proper and effective professional development courses and provide every and all students equal opportunity of technological tools.
All students should and will be given the equal opportunity to use and learn technology to become successful future citizens of the 21st century technology embedded world. All students including every race, gender and ability, will have that opportunity. We are all a part of this ever-changing society of technological advancements and we will work together to become as literate as we can.
After learning so much and minimizing some "intimidation" I still am curious about other technological areas. I envisioned being exposed and working much more closely with a variety of technological tools such as Wikis, podcasting, RSS etc. other than blogs. Besides blogging, I can't say I fully understand the other tools except what I have taken from the reading articles and other colleagues' input. I wish I had had the opportunity to work more closely with these tools and become more knowledgeable and familiar with them in order to incorporate them into my current teaching and future role as an instructional leader. However, having learned how to blog and its components, is another technological tool I previously did not encompass but now I do. I plan on creating and using a blog in my future role as an instructional leader as a means of communication with all stakeholders. It will provide a communication line for the students, staff, parents and community members. Discussion and sharing of information will be allowed for all stakeholders to continue the use of such technological tool.
Blogging is an instructional and communicative tool that can be used by all stakeholders when used safely. Blogging makes learning more interesting, exciting, more hands-on and visual. Teachers can use blogs as a means of communicating with parents and students, as a form of discussion in class, and a reading and writing tool for editing and revising amongst peers; parents can use blogs to communicate with teachers about assignments and students' progress; and students can use blogs as a form of discussion and sharing of ideas of all subject matters. Blogging needs to be appropriately modeled and monitored by educators to ensure appropriate and relevant information is being posted and shared. Students need to be taught the rules, standards, expectations and guidelines when using such tools in order to make the most out of the tools and their features. Overall blogging is a great educational tool if it is used safely and responsibility.
All in all, I have become more technologically literate than I could have imagined within just four weeks of learning. I now feel more knowledgeable and ready to be an instructional leader of 21st century technological world.
Thursday, December 17, 2009
Thursday, December 10, 2009
Action Plan
The overall action plan is for the district to become technologically literate according to the Technology Applications TEKS and standards.
After reviewing and analysing the CIP, DIP and Technology Applications TEKS and standards, our district needs to include additional goals and objectives that pertain more geared toward technology use and its components. Such goals and objectives might include:
Goal: The district will continue to provide more technology tools and resources available for staff and students.
- Each classroom needs to be provided and equipped with additional technology tools in order to successfully teach Technology Applications TEKS such as tools that might consist of Smartboards, laptops, digital cameras etc.
Goal: The district and campus staff performance in the use and applications of technology will continue to improve.
- 100% of teachers and administrators will have access to locally-provided on-going, standards-based, high quality technology-related professional development tailored to local needs and requests.
- The district will continue to participate in Region III's Shared Service Arrangement to obtain professional development for all personnel to increase student achievement, advance scores on STaR Chart, and build technology proficiencies based on SBEC Teacher Standards.
Goal: The administration of the district will provide effective leadership for all district in integrating technology into the curriculum and using technology for information management.
- All campuses will include technology use in campus-level planning.
- The district will continue to provide centrally deployed technical support.
- The district will continue to aggressively purse other sources of funding and equipment, including E-Rate, donations of used equipment, and other grants as available.
- All campuses and business office will continue to use technology for such programs such as PEIMS information management and submission.
Goal: All students and staff members will have a cost-efficient, effective, and safe educational technology infrastructure.
- All staff members at all campuses will have access to the hardware and software necessary for successful technology integration.
- The district will continue to provide safe, high-speed Internet access to all students and staff members.
Goal: All students will receive instruction that incorporates strategies that address their diverse learning needs in order to meet and exceed state academic standards.
- Students will receive instruction that integrates technology and is responsive to individual needs and learning styles.
- District will increase number of students, parents, community members and staff who have campus access to distance learning and video conferencing by 30%.
Such goals and objectives are the beginning of fulfilling the district's "vision" of being technologically literate. With a well defined vision, a clearly drawn plan an quality professional development to successfully educate the district and staff, such goals and objectives can be developed and met. With hard work, continuous evaluation at all levels and resources and tools that need to be provided for staff and students to learn, the district could become 21st century technology rich.
After reviewing and analysing the CIP, DIP and Technology Applications TEKS and standards, our district needs to include additional goals and objectives that pertain more geared toward technology use and its components. Such goals and objectives might include:
Goal: The district will continue to provide more technology tools and resources available for staff and students.
- Each classroom needs to be provided and equipped with additional technology tools in order to successfully teach Technology Applications TEKS such as tools that might consist of Smartboards, laptops, digital cameras etc.
Goal: The district and campus staff performance in the use and applications of technology will continue to improve.
- 100% of teachers and administrators will have access to locally-provided on-going, standards-based, high quality technology-related professional development tailored to local needs and requests.
- The district will continue to participate in Region III's Shared Service Arrangement to obtain professional development for all personnel to increase student achievement, advance scores on STaR Chart, and build technology proficiencies based on SBEC Teacher Standards.
Goal: The administration of the district will provide effective leadership for all district in integrating technology into the curriculum and using technology for information management.
- All campuses will include technology use in campus-level planning.
- The district will continue to provide centrally deployed technical support.
- The district will continue to aggressively purse other sources of funding and equipment, including E-Rate, donations of used equipment, and other grants as available.
- All campuses and business office will continue to use technology for such programs such as PEIMS information management and submission.
Goal: All students and staff members will have a cost-efficient, effective, and safe educational technology infrastructure.
- All staff members at all campuses will have access to the hardware and software necessary for successful technology integration.
- The district will continue to provide safe, high-speed Internet access to all students and staff members.
Goal: All students will receive instruction that incorporates strategies that address their diverse learning needs in order to meet and exceed state academic standards.
- Students will receive instruction that integrates technology and is responsive to individual needs and learning styles.
- District will increase number of students, parents, community members and staff who have campus access to distance learning and video conferencing by 30%.
Such goals and objectives are the beginning of fulfilling the district's "vision" of being technologically literate. With a well defined vision, a clearly drawn plan an quality professional development to successfully educate the district and staff, such goals and objectives can be developed and met. With hard work, continuous evaluation at all levels and resources and tools that need to be provided for staff and students to learn, the district could become 21st century technology rich.
Professional Development Plan
Overall professional development is key in educating individuals about technology, its importance and its components in order to effectively educate students. Proper and valuable professional development targeting technology is needed especially at our district. Due to an older generation of teachers, it is important to educate these individuals on how to use technology appropriately and effectively in order to educate the students.
Professional development is a concept that needs to be revamped in order for our society to shift to the new 21st century world of technology.
Technology Professional Development needs to be:
- available to all for all
- provided closer to the classroom with lessons for classroom instruction
- available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, online, to the desktop when and if possible
- provided in differentiated instruction for all levels of knowledge
- good-quality, research-based instruction
- required by all teachers a specific amount of hours each school year (at least 12 hours) with refresher courses throughout the year to update information and build on knowledge and experience
- a requirement by all "new" teachers at the beginning of school year along with a technology assessment to determine their level of experience and expertise with technology
- a requirement for all new teachers to pair up with older teachers (reverse mentoring) activity for each to learn from each other
- include a requirement that teachers create and teach at least five technology integrated lessons per school year
- vertically and horizontally aligned across all grade levels and subject matters
- provide planning, evaluating, sharing time throughout the year
- aligned with Technology Applications TEKS, SBEC requirements as well as district standards and expectations pertaining to district's Technology Plan
- explain and instruct teachers of the STaR Chart and how to successfully progress to the "Target Tech" level
- a continuous program, adapting and building on to the additional knowledge, skills and strategies for all sessions
Professional development is a concept that needs to be revamped in order for our society to shift to the new 21st century world of technology.
Technology Professional Development needs to be:
- available to all for all
- provided closer to the classroom with lessons for classroom instruction
- available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, online, to the desktop when and if possible
- provided in differentiated instruction for all levels of knowledge
- good-quality, research-based instruction
- required by all teachers a specific amount of hours each school year (at least 12 hours) with refresher courses throughout the year to update information and build on knowledge and experience
- a requirement by all "new" teachers at the beginning of school year along with a technology assessment to determine their level of experience and expertise with technology
- a requirement for all new teachers to pair up with older teachers (reverse mentoring) activity for each to learn from each other
- include a requirement that teachers create and teach at least five technology integrated lessons per school year
- vertically and horizontally aligned across all grade levels and subject matters
- provide planning, evaluating, sharing time throughout the year
- aligned with Technology Applications TEKS, SBEC requirements as well as district standards and expectations pertaining to district's Technology Plan
- explain and instruct teachers of the STaR Chart and how to successfully progress to the "Target Tech" level
- a continuous program, adapting and building on to the additional knowledge, skills and strategies for all sessions
Friday, November 27, 2009
Wednesday, November 25, 2009
STaR Chart Analysis of 2007-2008
2007-2008 STaR Chart Analysis of the Educator Preparation and Development Key Area
Summary Area: Educator Preparation and Development
Educator Preparation and Development is a vital area of preparing educators to effectively facilitate and manage the 21st century learning of technology of today's students. Such vital knowledge is necessary to comply with the new Texas Long-Range Plan for Technology of 2006-202o. Effective Educator Preparation and Development characteristics includes:
- provides necessary resources and tools to properly teach and educate the students to the best of their abilities
- continuous professional development refresher courses
Local Progress: My campus' local Educator Preparation and Development area progress has steadily been declining from year to year; rated its highest in 2006-2007 of being "Advanced Tech" with a score of 15, to a declining rating of "Developing Tech" with a score of 12 in 2007-2008 and since dropping to a score of 10 in 2008-2009, labeling us currently as "Developing Tech."
My belief to such decline is lack of focus on the technology concepts with more concentration placed on "core" curricular areas such as Reading and Math. Another reason for the downward spiraling trend could be lack of knowledge of the Texas STaR Chart assessment tool provided by administration. Most educators in the district have not been properly educated about the assessment and its importance. And our district overall has an older generation of educators who lack the technology experience and knowledge to effectively integrate technology into the curriculum.
Summary Area: Educator Preparation and Development
Educator Preparation and Development is a vital area of preparing educators to effectively facilitate and manage the 21st century learning of technology of today's students. Such vital knowledge is necessary to comply with the new Texas Long-Range Plan for Technology of 2006-202o. Effective Educator Preparation and Development characteristics includes:
- highly qualified and skilled personnel
- amble preparation time for educators to create, evaluate and share lessons, skills and strategies
- provides necessary resources and tools to properly teach and educate the students to the best of their abilities
- continuous professional development refresher courses
Local Progress: My campus' local Educator Preparation and Development area progress has steadily been declining from year to year; rated its highest in 2006-2007 of being "Advanced Tech" with a score of 15, to a declining rating of "Developing Tech" with a score of 12 in 2007-2008 and since dropping to a score of 10 in 2008-2009, labeling us currently as "Developing Tech."
My belief to such decline is lack of focus on the technology concepts with more concentration placed on "core" curricular areas such as Reading and Math. Another reason for the downward spiraling trend could be lack of knowledge of the Texas STaR Chart assessment tool provided by administration. Most educators in the district have not been properly educated about the assessment and its importance. And our district overall has an older generation of educators who lack the technology experience and knowledge to effectively integrate technology into the curriculum.
State and National Progress: According to the Campus Statewide Summary by Key Area, our campus' Educators Preparation and Development level of progress falls in the "Developing Technology" range with a number of 5668 and a percent of 74.2%. Our campus uses technology for administrative tasks and classroom management. There is a use of online resources. 40% of our educators meet the SBEC standards. The Administration expects teachers to use technology using 6-24% of technology budget which is allocated for professional development.
Improvements of Area: I believe improvements are necessary in this key area of Educator Preparation and Development in order for all educators and all students to effectively and appropriately learn and master the Technology Application TEKS. Improvements include:
- highly qualified and skilled educators
- continuous professional development sessions focused on technology and its components
- time for educators to develop rich-technology based lessons to share with other educators
- appropriate technology tools and resources to effectively educate students
Monday, November 23, 2009
Summary of Pre-Kindergarten Technology Applications & Explanation of a Spiraling Curriculum
Summary of Pre-Kindergarten Technology Applications
Preschool children are introduced and exposed to technology in order to enhance their lives and their education. Young children benefit from becoming aware of and interacting with technology devices and their applications and components. Through the use of technology, children learn to develop techniques for handling and controlling various technological devices, become more confident with working with the devices, and become independent users of age-appropriate technologies.
The Pre-Kindergarten Technology Applications consist of five basic concepts that the children should be introduced to and provided time to work with such technology tools. By the end of the Pre-Kindergarten year, students should be able to open and navigate through software programs; use and name a variety of computer input devices; operate voice/sound recorders and touch screens; use software applications to create and express their own ideas; and recognize that information is accessible through the use of technology. These basic concepts can be developed through the proper exposure and the appropriate opportunities by the educator.
The Pre-Kindergarten TEKS lay the foundation for student performance in future grades by exposing basic concepts to children at an early age. Young students' minds have the capacity to acquire, gain, and retain such knowledge when given the appropriate opportunities and foundations to do so. If such basic concepts are introduced and taught effectively and appropriately during the Pre-Kindergarten year, then students have the opportunity to gain a basic understand and importance of the use of technological devices and their components and how such technological knowledge can enhance their lives.
A Spiraling or Scaffolding Curriculum
A spiraling and scaffolding curriculum is defined as a building ladder for learning. Scaffolding is a process that teaches the basics and builds up from there. Scaffolding must begin from what is near to the students experience known as the "zone of actual development (ZAD)" and build to what is further from their experience known as the "zone of proximal development (ZPD)." The building process or construction starts from the ground up, on the foundation of what is already known and can be done. The new is built on top of the known. (Vygotsky)
Educational concepts or TEKS such as the Technology Applications TEKS are a fine example of a scaffolding curriculum. Such learning and concepts are taught at an early age level providing the appropriate resources and opportunities for such young minds to begin to acquire such skills. Preschool students are taught the basics of technology applications and its components at any early age. Once students gain a basic simplified understanding of the concepts at the Pre-Kindergarten level, they then "scaffold" or build up and learn new and more complex concepts as they progress from grade level to grade level. Students are introduced to information acquisition through the use of technology, websites, software etc. each school year. Information and concepts are added and built on to the already existing knowledge that was taught the previous year. Each year students are given the opportunity to gain more knowledge through additional skills and practice by creating, accessing, and navigating products. This is why Pre-Kindergarten Technology Applications are considered "scaffolding" curriculum.
Preschool children are introduced and exposed to technology in order to enhance their lives and their education. Young children benefit from becoming aware of and interacting with technology devices and their applications and components. Through the use of technology, children learn to develop techniques for handling and controlling various technological devices, become more confident with working with the devices, and become independent users of age-appropriate technologies.
The Pre-Kindergarten Technology Applications consist of five basic concepts that the children should be introduced to and provided time to work with such technology tools. By the end of the Pre-Kindergarten year, students should be able to open and navigate through software programs; use and name a variety of computer input devices; operate voice/sound recorders and touch screens; use software applications to create and express their own ideas; and recognize that information is accessible through the use of technology. These basic concepts can be developed through the proper exposure and the appropriate opportunities by the educator.
The Pre-Kindergarten TEKS lay the foundation for student performance in future grades by exposing basic concepts to children at an early age. Young students' minds have the capacity to acquire, gain, and retain such knowledge when given the appropriate opportunities and foundations to do so. If such basic concepts are introduced and taught effectively and appropriately during the Pre-Kindergarten year, then students have the opportunity to gain a basic understand and importance of the use of technological devices and their components and how such technological knowledge can enhance their lives.
A Spiraling or Scaffolding Curriculum
A spiraling and scaffolding curriculum is defined as a building ladder for learning. Scaffolding is a process that teaches the basics and builds up from there. Scaffolding must begin from what is near to the students experience known as the "zone of actual development (ZAD)" and build to what is further from their experience known as the "zone of proximal development (ZPD)." The building process or construction starts from the ground up, on the foundation of what is already known and can be done. The new is built on top of the known. (Vygotsky)
Educational concepts or TEKS such as the Technology Applications TEKS are a fine example of a scaffolding curriculum. Such learning and concepts are taught at an early age level providing the appropriate resources and opportunities for such young minds to begin to acquire such skills. Preschool students are taught the basics of technology applications and its components at any early age. Once students gain a basic simplified understanding of the concepts at the Pre-Kindergarten level, they then "scaffold" or build up and learn new and more complex concepts as they progress from grade level to grade level. Students are introduced to information acquisition through the use of technology, websites, software etc. each school year. Information and concepts are added and built on to the already existing knowledge that was taught the previous year. Each year students are given the opportunity to gain more knowledge through additional skills and practice by creating, accessing, and navigating products. This is why Pre-Kindergarten Technology Applications are considered "scaffolding" curriculum.
Long-Range Plan for Technology
After reviewing the Long-Range Technology Plan 2006-2020, I am more knowledgeable and aware of the need and importance of the developed technological advancements that are set in place for our students and society as a whole. Never before has our society, nation, world become more technologically challenged, advanced and intelligent than now. It is our nation's and our state's vision to create a program that will educate all stakeholders of the learning community of the importance of technology tools in order to prepare everyone for the advanced world, workforce, and future. With technology comes more challenges, struggles, duties, headaches but also opportunities, knowledge, possibilities in becoming more talented than ever. With the help of all stakeholders including administrators, leaders, educators, students and parents can such a dream become a vision and a reality.
After reviewing the Long-Range Technology Plan 2006-2020, I now know the importance of teaching, supplying and offering such technological opportunities and advancements to my future teachers and students of the learning community. I will not only model the use of technology for my staff and students. but will also encourage the use of technology and what it has to offer to better the education of our students and society.
After reviewing the Long-Range Technology Plan 2006-2020, I now know the importance of teaching, supplying and offering such technological opportunities and advancements to my future teachers and students of the learning community. I will not only model the use of technology for my staff and students. but will also encourage the use of technology and what it has to offer to better the education of our students and society.
Wednesday, November 18, 2009
Summary of Week 1's Assessments
I found the first assessment, The Technology Applications Inventory to be quite informative. It provided me with an overall result of my technological strengths and weaknesses broken down into four separate domains. The four domains consisted of: Foundations, Information Acquisition, Solving Problems with Technology Tools, and Communication. Of the four domains, I seemed to be technologically stronger in two areas.
The Foundations domain and the Solving Problems domain were my stronger areas, scoring 13 "yes'" to 5 "no's" and 12 "yes'" to 6 "no's." The Information Acquisition domain and the Communication domain scores were quite balanced, scoring 5 "yes'" to 5 "no's" and 7 "yes'" to 5 "no's."
Overall, I have a basic understanding of technology foundations and solving problems. My basic understandings consist of opening, creating, and publishing documents in programs such as Microsoft Word, PowerPoint, etc. for a variety of audiences. I can adjust and alter document's fonts, sizes, etc. when needed. If problems arise, I use technical instructional guides to assist me. My weaknesses consist of acquiring information about files; and evaluating electronic information for accuracy and validity. I am unsure on how to identify the source, location, media type, relevancy, and content validity of available information. In the communication area, I lack the ability of designing and implementing procedures to track trends and set time lines, etc. These are tools and strategies that I need to work on addressing and becoming more knowledgeable about. I think such tools could be beneficial to me and my students. Overall, I found this assessment to be informative and productive. I now know what areas I need to become more knowledgeable in to better serve myself and my students.
The second assessment, The SETDA Teacher Survey was quite different. It was lengthy and did not provide an overall conclusion of results. The survey covered many areas dealing with technology, the use of technology, the amount and time of usage, etc.; however, I did not get an overall result of any technological strengths and weaknesses as provided by the other survey. The SETDA Teacher Survey did in fact make me more aware of certain concepts and the importance of integrating technology in my classroom. Certain questions that were asked brought attention to concepts that I originally didn't know much about; such questions as T9-T14 referring to "data" and its results, whether or not technology is impacting students' skills. These questions stunned me; I don't truly know if my district performs such assessments to gather data about the impact of technology on our students; however, the survey made me curious to do further research on the topic. Overall, I didn't find this survey to be as informative as the other. It did not provide me with actual strengths and weaknesses that I need to address, but it did inform me and make me more aware of if technology is being used; how much; when; if it is being productive and such. At the Kindergarten level I teach, students are provided the opportunity to work with technology at least once or twice a week in computer labs and are exposed to a variety of other technological tools throughout the day in the classroom; however, I believe we could all work harder at addressing the technological needs of the students more in order to better prepare them for the future.
The Foundations domain and the Solving Problems domain were my stronger areas, scoring 13 "yes'" to 5 "no's" and 12 "yes'" to 6 "no's." The Information Acquisition domain and the Communication domain scores were quite balanced, scoring 5 "yes'" to 5 "no's" and 7 "yes'" to 5 "no's."
Overall, I have a basic understanding of technology foundations and solving problems. My basic understandings consist of opening, creating, and publishing documents in programs such as Microsoft Word, PowerPoint, etc. for a variety of audiences. I can adjust and alter document's fonts, sizes, etc. when needed. If problems arise, I use technical instructional guides to assist me. My weaknesses consist of acquiring information about files; and evaluating electronic information for accuracy and validity. I am unsure on how to identify the source, location, media type, relevancy, and content validity of available information. In the communication area, I lack the ability of designing and implementing procedures to track trends and set time lines, etc. These are tools and strategies that I need to work on addressing and becoming more knowledgeable about. I think such tools could be beneficial to me and my students. Overall, I found this assessment to be informative and productive. I now know what areas I need to become more knowledgeable in to better serve myself and my students.
The second assessment, The SETDA Teacher Survey was quite different. It was lengthy and did not provide an overall conclusion of results. The survey covered many areas dealing with technology, the use of technology, the amount and time of usage, etc.; however, I did not get an overall result of any technological strengths and weaknesses as provided by the other survey. The SETDA Teacher Survey did in fact make me more aware of certain concepts and the importance of integrating technology in my classroom. Certain questions that were asked brought attention to concepts that I originally didn't know much about; such questions as T9-T14 referring to "data" and its results, whether or not technology is impacting students' skills. These questions stunned me; I don't truly know if my district performs such assessments to gather data about the impact of technology on our students; however, the survey made me curious to do further research on the topic. Overall, I didn't find this survey to be as informative as the other. It did not provide me with actual strengths and weaknesses that I need to address, but it did inform me and make me more aware of if technology is being used; how much; when; if it is being productive and such. At the Kindergarten level I teach, students are provided the opportunity to work with technology at least once or twice a week in computer labs and are exposed to a variety of other technological tools throughout the day in the classroom; however, I believe we could all work harder at addressing the technological needs of the students more in order to better prepare them for the future.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)